Towards improved governance for sustainable solid waste management in Lebanon: Centralised vs decentralised approaches

dc.contributor.authorMassoud, May A.
dc.contributor.authorMokbel, Michel
dc.contributor.authorAlawieh, Suheir
dc.contributor.authorYassin, Nasser
dc.contributor.departmentEnvironmental Health (ENHL)
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Management and Policy (HMPD)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:34:20Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:34:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractSolid waste management is a multifaceted task that incorporates a diverse set of shareholders and operations. To create a sustainable solid waste management system, governments should select the most advantageous organisational structure, given a country’s current setting; contextualising the sector’s administrative structure in accordance with a nation’s organisational constraints. This research aimed to determine the recommended level of administrative and financial decentralisation for each solid waste management operation and explore the susceptibilities and prospects of each level of governance in Lebanon. Primary data was gathered from environmental experts and concerned organisations using a semi-structured in-depth interview. Results revealed that the optimal model for solid waste management in the case of Lebanon incurs devolving collection, which would assimilate local populations into the decision-making process and reduce opposition towards devised solid waste management plans. Delegation and the construction of centralised treatment facilities is recommended as it incentivises municipal cooperation and permits the installation of methodologies and technologies that reflect the limitations, public attitudes, and waste dynamics of each distinct geographical territory. Deconcentrating disposal would limit the number of landfills constructed and facilitate monitoring. Administrative and constitutional reformations that clearly define the roles and responsibilities of public agencies would reduce the influence of the central authority on peripheral states. The establishment of municipal cooperation models would diminish regional economic disparities by enhancing the level of communication and collaboration between subnational bodies. The performance of decentralised strategies should be continuously monitored to ensure that local administrators are held accountable. © The Author(s) 2019.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19836705
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85063574931
dc.identifier.pmid30912714
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/28053
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofWaste Management and Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCentralisation
dc.subjectChallenges
dc.subjectDecentralisation
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectProspects
dc.subjectSolid waste
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectRefuse disposal
dc.subjectWaste disposal facilities
dc.subjectWaste management
dc.subjectRegional planning
dc.subjectSolid wastes
dc.subjectWaste treatment
dc.subjectAdministrative structures
dc.subjectCommunication and collaborations
dc.subjectOrganisational structure
dc.subjectSolid waste management systems
dc.subjectDecentralization
dc.subjectGovernance approach
dc.subjectLandfill
dc.subjectPublic attitude
dc.subjectStrategic approach
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectAdministrative personnel
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectCentralization
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectInterview
dc.subjectMonitoring
dc.subjectOrganization
dc.subjectResponsibility
dc.subjectSolid waste management
dc.subjectWaste disposal
dc.subjectWaste disposal facility
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.titleTowards improved governance for sustainable solid waste management in Lebanon: Centralised vs decentralised approaches
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7493.pdf
Size:
232.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format