A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Compare Fiber reinforced Concrete Mixes
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yehya, Alissar | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hamad, Bilal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karakira, Laurence | |
| dc.contributor.commembers | Maalouf, Elsa | |
| dc.contributor.degree | MS | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date | 2025 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-19T11:12:36Z | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-12-14T22:00:00Z | |
| dc.description | Release date: 2028-12-15. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Concrete mix design is a complex process that requires balancing multiple, and often conflicting, criteria such as structural performance, durability, environmental impact, and cost-efficiency. In recent years, various research studies have explored the application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods to address this challenge. Building upon this body of work, the objective of this thesis is to develop an integrated decision-support tool that enables engineers to design concrete mixes tailored to specific project requirements and application scenarios. The proposed tool incorporates a structured evaluation framework based on two widely recognized MCDM techniques: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). A key focus of this study is on establishing accurate and scenario-sensitive weights for the evaluation criteria. This is achieved through a dual approach: (1) expert-based weighting using AHP surveys conducted among experienced structural engineers, and (2) simulation-based weighting derived from modeling structural elements—such as columns, beams, and shear walls—using COMSOL Multiphysics software. Recognizing that the selection of an appropriate MCDM method is crucial and context-dependent, this research highlights the importance of aligning the method with the specific decision-making environment. Furthermore, to enhance the tool’s practical applicability, predefined scenario templates for different applications—such as high-rise buildings, seismic retrofits, and industrial facilities—are developed. By integrating both theoretical and practical perspectives, this research provides engineers with a reliable and efficient tool for optimizing concrete mix designs. The tool not only streamlines the decision-making process but also minimizes time, effort, and the risk of suboptimal choices, ultimately contributing to more sustainable and effective construction practices. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10938/35118 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Fiber-reinforced concrete | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Concrete--Mixing | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Decision making | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Structural engineering | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Mathematical optimization | |
| dc.title | A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Compare Fiber reinforced Concrete Mixes | |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| local.AUBID | 201800764 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
- Name:
- KarakiraLaurence_2025.pdf
- Size:
- 5.08 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Main Thesis
Loading...
- Name:
- KarakiraLaurence_ReleaseForm_2025.pdf
- Size:
- 568.29 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Release Form
Loading...
- Name:
- KarakiraLaurence_ApprovalForm_2025.pdf
- Size:
- 74.46 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Approval Form
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.65 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: