A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Compare Fiber reinforced Concrete Mixes

dc.contributor.advisorYehya, Alissar
dc.contributor.advisorHamad, Bilal
dc.contributor.authorKarakira, Laurence
dc.contributor.commembersMaalouf, Elsa
dc.contributor.degreeMS
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date2025
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T11:12:36Z
dc.date.submitted2025-12-14T22:00:00Z
dc.descriptionRelease date: 2028-12-15.
dc.description.abstractConcrete mix design is a complex process that requires balancing multiple, and often conflicting, criteria such as structural performance, durability, environmental impact, and cost-efficiency. In recent years, various research studies have explored the application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods to address this challenge. Building upon this body of work, the objective of this thesis is to develop an integrated decision-support tool that enables engineers to design concrete mixes tailored to specific project requirements and application scenarios. The proposed tool incorporates a structured evaluation framework based on two widely recognized MCDM techniques: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). A key focus of this study is on establishing accurate and scenario-sensitive weights for the evaluation criteria. This is achieved through a dual approach: (1) expert-based weighting using AHP surveys conducted among experienced structural engineers, and (2) simulation-based weighting derived from modeling structural elements—such as columns, beams, and shear walls—using COMSOL Multiphysics software. Recognizing that the selection of an appropriate MCDM method is crucial and context-dependent, this research highlights the importance of aligning the method with the specific decision-making environment. Furthermore, to enhance the tool’s practical applicability, predefined scenario templates for different applications—such as high-rise buildings, seismic retrofits, and industrial facilities—are developed. By integrating both theoretical and practical perspectives, this research provides engineers with a reliable and efficient tool for optimizing concrete mix designs. The tool not only streamlines the decision-making process but also minimizes time, effort, and the risk of suboptimal choices, ultimately contributing to more sustainable and effective construction practices.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10938/35118
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject.lcshFiber-reinforced concrete
dc.subject.lcshConcrete--Mixing
dc.subject.lcshDecision making
dc.subject.lcshStructural engineering
dc.subject.lcshMathematical optimization
dc.titleA Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Compare Fiber reinforced Concrete Mixes
dc.typeThesis
local.AUBID201800764

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KarakiraLaurence_2025.pdf
Size:
5.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Thesis
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KarakiraLaurence_ReleaseForm_2025.pdf
Size:
568.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Release Form
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KarakiraLaurence_ApprovalForm_2025.pdf
Size:
74.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Approval Form

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: