Comparison of various reactive transport simulators for geological carbon sequestration

dc.contributor.authorAddassi, Mouadh
dc.contributor.authorOmar, Abdirizak
dc.contributor.authorGhorayeb, Kassem
dc.contributor.authorHoteit, Hussein A.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:26:27Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:26:27Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe capabilities of reactive transport modeling codes for geological carbon sequestration have improved significantly in the past decade. Comparing different geochemical modeling codes is crucial to identify modeling discrepancies, especially when experimental validation is not feasible. However, it is challenging to consistently get comparable results, as shown in previous studies where batch reaction of CO2 storage using different simulators sometimes resulted in significant discrepancies in their outputs. In this study, we introduce and demonstrate an approach to consistently produce comparable batch-reaction modeling of kinetically controlled CO2-water-rock interactions in PHREEQC, TOUGHREACT, and GEM, which are amongst the most widely used simulators for CO2 sequestration studies. The primary step is to assemble a thermodynamic database in PHREEQC format, with representative fluid properties for CO2-water interaction, and carefully convert it to the format of the other simulators. We use two case studies from the literature to demonstrate our method where good matches between the outputs of all three simulators were achieved, which was not previously attained. Furthermore, limiting the discrepancies in batch-reaction models provides a consistent baseline to study the coupled mechanisms of transport and chemical reaction, which was also successfully demonstrated with a one-dimensional reactive transport model in PHREEQC, GEM and TOUGHREACT. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103419
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85111797149
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/26599
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCo2 sequestration
dc.subjectCo2 solubility
dc.subjectCo2-water-rock interaction
dc.subjectMineral dissolution/precipitation
dc.subjectReactive transport
dc.subjectThermodynamic database
dc.subjectCarbon
dc.subjectCarbon dioxide
dc.subjectGeology
dc.subjectCarbon sequestration
dc.subjectExperimental validations
dc.subjectGeochemical modeling
dc.subjectKinetically controlled
dc.subjectModel discrepancies
dc.subjectReactive transport modeling
dc.subjectWater rock interactions
dc.subjectDissolution
dc.subjectSolubility
dc.subjectThermodynamics
dc.subjectTransport structure
dc.subjectWater-rock interaction
dc.subjectSimulators
dc.titleComparison of various reactive transport simulators for geological carbon sequestration
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021-5966.pdf
Size:
2.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format