Facial soft tissue thickness differences among different vertical facial patterns

dc.contributor.authorSaadeh, Maria E.
dc.contributor.authorFayyad-Kazan, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Ramzi V.
dc.contributor.authorAyoub, Fouad
dc.contributor.departmentOtolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:09:29Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:09:29Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIn forensic facial approximation, facial soft tissue thickness (FSTT) measurements play a major role. These values are affected by many factors such as ethnicity, age and sex, in addition to measurement errors. We hypothesize that an additional source of error is the lack of consideration of facial type in the assessment of FSTT norms. The purpose of this study was to: 1- evaluate the presence of significant effects of vertical facial type within the FSTT measurements in adults and 2- assess the correlations between FSTT and hard and soft tissue cephalometric measurements. The sample consisted of the lateral cephalometric radiographs of 222 adult individuals (87 males; 135 females, 23.49 ± 6.24 years of age) with normal occlusion and balanced profiles. Hard and soft tissue cephalometric measurements were taken, in addition to FSST at 10 facial landmarks. The sample was categorized into 3 vertical pattern groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent, normodivergent and hyperdivergent. Statistical analyses included MANOVA test and Pearson moment product for associations among variables. Statistically significant effect of vertical divergence on FSTT values was limited to the levels of Stomion, Labiomentale and Pogonion and FSTT measurements were associated with measurements related to the lower face (Lm and Pog) Moderate to high correlations between mandibular length and ramus length and FSTT values related to the lower face (LL, Lm and Pog mainly) emphasize further the important role of the underlying skeleton. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110468
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85091216123
dc.identifier.pmid32971443
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32073
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofForensic Science International
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCephalometric norms
dc.subjectSoft tissue thickness
dc.subjectVertical divergence
dc.subjectAnatomic landmarks
dc.subjectCephalometry
dc.subjectFace
dc.subjectFacial bones
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectForensic anthropology
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectRadiography
dc.subjectVertical dimension
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAge distribution
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectCorrelation analysis
dc.subjectCraniofacial morphology
dc.subjectCross-sectional study
dc.subjectFacial soft tissue thickness
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman tissue
dc.subjectMandible
dc.subjectMeasurement error
dc.subjectPopulation research
dc.subjectPredictor variable
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectSex difference
dc.subjectSkull radiography
dc.subjectSoft tissue
dc.subjectVertical facial pattern
dc.subjectAnatomic landmark
dc.subjectAnatomy and histology
dc.subjectDiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectFacial bone
dc.subjectVertical dimension of occlusion
dc.titleFacial soft tissue thickness differences among different vertical facial patterns
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6369.pdf
Size:
921.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format