Vertebral body tethering: An alternative to posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis?

dc.contributor.authorHammad, Ahmad M.
dc.contributor.authorBalsano, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Alaaeldin Azmi
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:14:32Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:14:32Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Skeletally immature patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) whose curves continue to progress despite bracing should be treated surgically. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion, compression-based, growth preserving alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) based on the concept of ‘growth modulation’ to prevent possible functional complications secondary to fusion while correcting scoliotic deformity. This review aims to shed light on the indications of VBT, short- and medium-term outcomes, describe the surgical technique and associated complications, and to compare its efficacy to that of PSF. Methods: A review of peer-reviewed literature on VBT as a surgical technique, its indications, outcomes, complications, and comparison with other surgical interventions to correct AIS was conducted in December 2022. Results: Indications remain controversial and mainly include stage of skeletal maturity based on radiographic markers, curve location, magnitude and flexibility, and presence of secondary curve. Assessment of VBT clinical success should not be restricted to improvement in radiographic parameters but should include functional results and patient-centered outcomes, improved body image and pain, and durability of outcomes. In contrast to fusion, VBT seems to be associated with preserved spinal growth, shorter recovery, potentially better functional outcomes, less motion loss but possibly less curve correction. Discussion: Yet still, with VBT there exists a risk of overcorrection, construct breakage or failure of procedure which require revision and at times conversion to PSF. Patient and family preferences must be accounted for acknowledging gaps in knowledge, attributes and drawbacks of each intervention. 2023 Hammad, Balsano and Ahmad.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1133049
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85150921643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/33201
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Pediatrics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectIdiopathic scoliosis
dc.subjectOvercorrection
dc.subjectPediatric scoliosis and kyphosis
dc.subjectPosterior spinal fusion
dc.subjectTether breakage
dc.subjectVertebral body tethering
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectAtelectasis
dc.subjectBody image
dc.subjectBone maturation
dc.subjectChylothorax
dc.subjectClinical article
dc.subjectClinical outcome
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHematothorax
dc.subjectHorner syndrome
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectLung complication
dc.subjectLung edema
dc.subjectMotion
dc.subjectPleura effusion
dc.subjectPosterior spine fusion
dc.subjectPostoperative complication
dc.subjectSpine radiography
dc.subjectSpine surgery
dc.subjectSurgical infection
dc.subjectTherapy effect
dc.subjectVertebra body
dc.titleVertebral body tethering: An alternative to posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis?
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-1115.pdf
Size:
13.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections