Neuromonitoring for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery

dc.contributor.authorVerla, Terence
dc.contributor.authorFridley, Jared Steven
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Abdul Basit
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Rory Richard
dc.contributor.authorOmeis, Ibrahim A.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:12:44Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:12:44Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT) account for about 2%-4% of tumors of the central nervous system. Surgical resection continues to be the most effective treatment modality for most intramedullary tumors, with gross total resection leading to preserved neurologic function and improved survival. However, surgical treatment is often difficult and carries significant risk of postoperative neurologic complications. Intraoperative neuromonitoring has been shown to be of clinical importance in the surgical resection of IMSCT. The main monitoring modalities include somatosensory evoked potentials, transcranial motor evoked potentials via limb muscles or spinal epidural space (D-waves), and dorsal column mapping. These monitoring modalities have been shown to inform surgeons intraoperatively and in many cases, have led to alterations in operative decision. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on the usefulness of intraoperative neuromonitoring for intramedullary spinal tumor resection and its role in predicting postoperative neurologic deficits. A MEDLINE search was performed (2000-2015) and 13 studies were reviewed. Detailed information and data from the selected articles were assessed and compiled. Data were extracted showing the role of monitoring in outcomes of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: By using intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials, transcranial motor evoked potentials, D-waves, and dorsal column mapping, spinal injury could be prevented in most cases, thereby improving postoperative neurologic functioning and outcome in patients undergoing surgery for IMSCT.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.066
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84983488813
dc.identifier.pmid27474459
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32862
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Neurosurgery
dc.sourceMedline
dc.subjectElectric stimulation
dc.subjectEpidural space
dc.subjectEvoked potentials, motor
dc.subjectEvoked potentials, somatosensory
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoring/methods
dc.subjectMuscle, skeletal
dc.subjectNeurosurgical procedures/methods
dc.subjectPostoperative complications/prevention & control
dc.subjectSpinal cord neoplasms/surgery
dc.subjectIntramedullary tumor
dc.subjectIntraoperative monitoring
dc.subjectOutcomes
dc.subjectSpinal injury
dc.titleNeuromonitoring for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9222.pdf
Size:
1.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections