Comparison of standard and Quadruple-Phase contrast Material injection for artifacts, image Quality, and radiation Dose in the evaluation of head and neck cancer Metastases

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Radiological Society of North America Inc.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate opacification of head and neck vasculature during computed tomography (CT) of supraclavicular lymph nodes with a quadruple-phase contrast media and saline dual-injection protocol. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was institutional review board approved. In 180 consecutive patients, routine head and neck CT was performed with one of two protocols: protocol A, craniocaudal scan direction with 100 mL of contrast material injected intravenously as a single bolus; or protocol B, 100 mL of contrast material injected in four phases (phases 1-2, 60 mL of contrast material and saline injected at 2.5 mL/sec; phases 3-4, 40 mL of contrast material and saline injected at 2.5 mL/sec); both protocols had a fixed scan delay of 70 seconds. Attenuation of supraclavicular arteries and veins was measured with arteriovenous contrast ratio (AVCR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Effective dose was calculated. Data were compared with the two-sample t test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and visual grading characteristic analyses were performed. Results: Arterial attenuation was up to 20% higher (P <.05) after protocol B (mean ± standard deviation, 234.5 HU ± 33.2) than protocol A (160.0 HU ± 29.5). Venous system attenuation was significantly lower in protocol B (164.0 HU ± 17.0) than in protocol A (664.0 HU ± 12.0), with up to a 75% reduction (P <.0001). Protocol B generated significant (P <.0001) improvements in AVCR at multiple anatomic sites. At all anatomic levels, mean CNR with protocol B (34.4 HU ± 9.0) was significantly higher than that with protocol A (14.5 HU ± 14.0) (P <.0313). Effective dose was significantly reduced with protocol B (2.6 mSv ± 0.4 vs 3.2 mSv ± 0.8 with protocol A; P <.0041). ROC analysis demonstrated significantly higher area under the ROC curve for protocol B (P <.0022), with interreader agreement increasing from poor to excellent in lymph node visualization. Conclusion: Significant improvement in lymph node visualization at the cervicothoracic junction is achieved with a quadruplephase contrast media injection protocol. © 2015 RSNA.

Description

Keywords

Artifacts, Contrast media, Female, Head and neck neoplasms, Humans, Injections, intravenous, Male, Neoplasm metastasis, Radiation dosage, Retrospective studies, Tomography, x-ray computed, Triiodobenzoic acids, Contrast medium, Ioversol, Sodium chloride, Iodobenzoic acid derivative, Area under the curve, Arteriovenous contrast ratio, Article, Artifact, Computer assisted tomography, Contrast to noise ratio, Controlled study, Diagnostic test accuracy study, Head and neck cancer, Human, Image quality, Imaging and display, Lymph node metastasis, Major clinical study, Priority journal, Radiation depth dose, Radiation dose, Receiver operating characteristic, Retrospective study, Comparative study, Head and neck tumor, Intravenous drug administration, Metastasis, Pathology, Procedures, Radiography

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By