Comparison of standard and Quadruple-Phase contrast Material injection for artifacts, image Quality, and radiation Dose in the evaluation of head and neck cancer Metastases
| dc.contributor.author | Saade, Charbel | |
| dc.contributor.author | El-Merhi, Fadi M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mayat, Ahmad M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brennan, Patrick C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yousem, David Mark | |
| dc.contributor.department | Diagnostic Radiology | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T11:41:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T11:41:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To investigate opacification of head and neck vasculature during computed tomography (CT) of supraclavicular lymph nodes with a quadruple-phase contrast media and saline dual-injection protocol. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was institutional review board approved. In 180 consecutive patients, routine head and neck CT was performed with one of two protocols: protocol A, craniocaudal scan direction with 100 mL of contrast material injected intravenously as a single bolus; or protocol B, 100 mL of contrast material injected in four phases (phases 1-2, 60 mL of contrast material and saline injected at 2.5 mL/sec; phases 3-4, 40 mL of contrast material and saline injected at 2.5 mL/sec); both protocols had a fixed scan delay of 70 seconds. Attenuation of supraclavicular arteries and veins was measured with arteriovenous contrast ratio (AVCR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Effective dose was calculated. Data were compared with the two-sample t test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and visual grading characteristic analyses were performed. Results: Arterial attenuation was up to 20% higher (P <.05) after protocol B (mean ± standard deviation, 234.5 HU ± 33.2) than protocol A (160.0 HU ± 29.5). Venous system attenuation was significantly lower in protocol B (164.0 HU ± 17.0) than in protocol A (664.0 HU ± 12.0), with up to a 75% reduction (P <.0001). Protocol B generated significant (P <.0001) improvements in AVCR at multiple anatomic sites. At all anatomic levels, mean CNR with protocol B (34.4 HU ± 9.0) was significantly higher than that with protocol A (14.5 HU ± 14.0) (P <.0313). Effective dose was significantly reduced with protocol B (2.6 mSv ± 0.4 vs 3.2 mSv ± 0.8 with protocol A; P <.0041). ROC analysis demonstrated significantly higher area under the ROC curve for protocol B (P <.0022), with interreader agreement increasing from poor to excellent in lymph node visualization. Conclusion: Significant improvement in lymph node visualization at the cervicothoracic junction is achieved with a quadruplephase contrast media injection protocol. © 2015 RSNA. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150511 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-84965136600 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 26624972 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/29626 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Radiological Society of North America Inc. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Radiology | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Artifacts | |
| dc.subject | Contrast media | |
| dc.subject | Female | |
| dc.subject | Head and neck neoplasms | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Injections, intravenous | |
| dc.subject | Male | |
| dc.subject | Neoplasm metastasis | |
| dc.subject | Radiation dosage | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective studies | |
| dc.subject | Tomography, x-ray computed | |
| dc.subject | Triiodobenzoic acids | |
| dc.subject | Contrast medium | |
| dc.subject | Ioversol | |
| dc.subject | Sodium chloride | |
| dc.subject | Iodobenzoic acid derivative | |
| dc.subject | Area under the curve | |
| dc.subject | Arteriovenous contrast ratio | |
| dc.subject | Article | |
| dc.subject | Artifact | |
| dc.subject | Computer assisted tomography | |
| dc.subject | Contrast to noise ratio | |
| dc.subject | Controlled study | |
| dc.subject | Diagnostic test accuracy study | |
| dc.subject | Head and neck cancer | |
| dc.subject | Human | |
| dc.subject | Image quality | |
| dc.subject | Imaging and display | |
| dc.subject | Lymph node metastasis | |
| dc.subject | Major clinical study | |
| dc.subject | Priority journal | |
| dc.subject | Radiation depth dose | |
| dc.subject | Radiation dose | |
| dc.subject | Receiver operating characteristic | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective study | |
| dc.subject | Comparative study | |
| dc.subject | Head and neck tumor | |
| dc.subject | Intravenous drug administration | |
| dc.subject | Metastasis | |
| dc.subject | Pathology | |
| dc.subject | Procedures | |
| dc.subject | Radiography | |
| dc.title | Comparison of standard and Quadruple-Phase contrast Material injection for artifacts, image Quality, and radiation Dose in the evaluation of head and neck cancer Metastases | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1