Second-line Modified GTX versus Gemcitabine-Nab-Paclitaxel (GmAb) Following First-Line FOLFIRINOX in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC)

dc.contributor.authorTemraz, Sally N.
dc.contributor.authorKreidieh, Firas Y.
dc.contributor.authorNassar, Farah J.
dc.contributor.authorMezher, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMukherji, Deborah M.
dc.contributor.authorShamseddine, Ali I.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:46:11Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:46:11Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pancreatic cancer is characterized by its generally poor prognosis and ranks seventh worldwide in cancer-related mortality. We previously conducted a prospective study on the use of modified GTX regimen (a combination of gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine), which has appreciable activity and is well-tolerated, in this setting. We compared the efficacy of GTX regimen versus Gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (GmAb) as second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving first-line therapy with FOLFIRINOX. Method: This retrospective chart review aimed to collect and record data corresponding to patients diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer at the American University of Beirut Medical Center who received FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy and who then had GTX or GmAb as second-line treatment between 2013 and 2019. We measured the progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity of GTX versus GmAb as second-line treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma at AUBMC. Results: The median overall survival for the GmAb group was around 52 months, which is greater than that of the GTX group, which was 25 months. 26.7% of patients who received GTX required dose reduction starting from cycle one, while only 3.1% of those who received GmAb required dose reduction from cycle one. 38.7% of patients who received GmAb did not have anemia throughout the course of treatment, while the majority of patients who received GTX, 93.3%, had grade I anemia. Conclusion: Our data show that GmAb is a possibly better second-line treatment option than GTX with better tolerance to the dose, less anemia, and a better survival profile. More studies are needed with a larger sample size and a prospective design to prove such a possible difference between the two regimens. © 2023, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.30476/mejc.2023.95050.1770
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85173209118
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30637
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherShiraz University of Medical Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofMiddle East Journal of Cancer
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFolfirinox
dc.subjectGemcitabine
dc.subjectPancreatic neoplasms
dc.subjectSecond-line chemotherapy
dc.subjectCapecitabine
dc.subjectDocetaxel
dc.subjectFluorouracil
dc.subjectFolinic acid
dc.subjectIrinotecan
dc.subjectOxaliplatin
dc.subjectPaclitaxel
dc.subjectAnemia
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectCancer chemotherapy
dc.subjectCancer radiotherapy
dc.subjectCancer staging
dc.subjectCancer survival
dc.subjectDisease free survival
dc.subjectDrug dose reduction
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow up
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectInduction chemotherapy
dc.subjectLymph node metastasis
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOverall survival
dc.subjectPancreas adenocarcinoma
dc.subjectPancreas cancer
dc.subjectProgression free survival
dc.subjectProspective study
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.subjectRisk factor
dc.subjectSample size
dc.subjectTumor volume
dc.titleSecond-line Modified GTX versus Gemcitabine-Nab-Paclitaxel (GmAb) Following First-Line FOLFIRINOX in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC)
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-468.pdf
Size:
621.49 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format