Lack of negative autocorrelations of daily food intake on successive days challenges the concept of the regulation of body weight in humans

dc.contributor.authorLevitsky, David A.
dc.contributor.authorRaea Limb, Ji Eun
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Lua
dc.contributor.authorSewall, Anna
dc.contributor.authorZhong, Yingyi
dc.contributor.authorOlabi, Ammar A.
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Jean B.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences (FAFS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:18:59Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:18:59Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAccording to most theories, the amount of food consumed on one day should be negatively related to intake on subsequent days. Several studies have observed such a negative correlation between the amount consumed on one day and the amount consumed two to four days later. The present study attempted to replicate this observation by re-examining data from a previous study where all food ingested over a 30-day observation period was measured. Nine male and seven female participants received a vegan diet prepared, dispensed, and measured in a metabolic unit. Autocorrelations were performed on total food intake consume on one day and that consumed one to five days later. A significant positive correlation was detected between the weight of food eaten on one day and on the amount consumed on the following day (r = 0.29, 95% CI [0.37, 0.20]). No correlation was found between weights of food consumed on one day and up to twelve days later (r = 0.09, 95% CI [0.24, −0.06]), (r = 0.11, 95% CI [0.26, −0.0.26]) (r = 0.02, 95% CI [0.15, −0.7]) (r = −0.08, 95% CI [0.11, −0.09]). The same positive correlation with the previous day's intake was observed at the succeeding breakfast but not at either lunch or dinner. However, the participants underestimated their daily energy need resulting in a small, but statistically significant weight loss. Daily food intake increased slightly (13 g/day), but significantly, across the 30-day period. An analysis of the previous studies revealed that the negative correlations observed by others was caused by a statistical artifact resulting from normalizing data before testing for the correlations. These results, when combined with the published literature, indicate that there is little evidence that humans precisely compensate for the previous day's intake by altering the amount consumed on subsequent days. Moreover, the small but persistent increase in food intake suggests that physiological mechanisms that affect food intake operate more subtly and over much longer periods of time than the meal or even total daily intake. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.038
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85019107977
dc.identifier.pmid28483583
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/24768
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAcademic Press
dc.relation.ispartofAppetite
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectBody mass index
dc.subjectBody weight
dc.subjectBreakfast
dc.subjectCaloric restriction
dc.subjectDiet
dc.subjectDietary carbohydrates
dc.subjectDietary fats
dc.subjectDietary proteins
dc.subjectEating
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLunch
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMeals
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectClinical article
dc.subjectFood intake
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectStatistical model
dc.subjectVegan diet
dc.subjectWeight reduction
dc.subjectBody mass
dc.subjectCarbohydrate diet
dc.subjectFat intake
dc.subjectMeal
dc.subjectProtein intake
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectNutrition
dc.titleLack of negative autocorrelations of daily food intake on successive days challenges the concept of the regulation of body weight in humans
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-8714.pdf
Size:
392.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format