Efficacy of lung cancer screening at the American University of Beirut Medical Center

dc.contributor.authorHarb, Tarek S.
dc.contributor.authorAlhafi, Anas
dc.contributor.authorTfayli, Arafat Hussein
dc.contributor.departmentOSB
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.facultySuliman S. Olayan School of Business (OSB)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:16:09Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:16:09Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In Lebanon, a dedicated screening program for lung cancer is absent. Screening is largely based on the recommendation of an informed physician or the initiative of a patient. To better understand the situation, it is important to look at the available data on patients currently being screened for lung cancer in this country. Our aim in this study is to review the data and compare it with that in the literature as well as to assess the efficacy of the screening process followed. Methods: Our study accessed the electronic medical records of patients at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary care center in Lebanon. We collected information on patients who underwent screening low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan between June 2019 and June 2021 inclusive. Records of all patients who underwent a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan at AUBMC during this period were collected and analyzed. Results: On average, our population had a 52.6 pack-year smoking history. Moreover, 47% of our population had an accurate pack-year reported, while 12% did not have enough information to even estimate their pack-year history. When looking at the accurate and estimated data, 5% of our population did not even meet the ≥20 pack-year smoking history. Eight patients had positive findings on the screening LDCT, which we defined as suspicious findings that require further workup (e.g., PET/CT or biopsy) or other significant incidental findings. Conclusion: A well-organized program for lung cancer screening in Lebanon is absent. Screening largely depends on the initiative of the physician or the patient. We were able to uncover multiple flaws in the screening method used, including poor documentation and follow-up. Although the screening method adopted retained some benefits in terms of detecting early malignancy, it lacked proper organization and was not ideal. A better, systematized screening program is needed to have optimal outcomes. Copyright © 2023 Harb, Alhafi and Tfayli.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1164574
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85168370745
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/33528
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Oncology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEarly detection of cancer
dc.subjectLung neoplasms
dc.subjectSecondary prevention
dc.subjectSmoking
dc.subjectThoracic oncology
dc.subjectFluorodeoxyglucose f 18
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAmerican
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectCancer patient
dc.subjectCancer screening
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus
dc.subjectDyslipidemia
dc.subjectEarly cancer diagnosis
dc.subjectElectronic medical record
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow up
dc.subjectGround glass opacity
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman tissue
dc.subjectHypertension
dc.subjectImaging
dc.subjectIncidental finding
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectLobectomy
dc.subjectLow-dose computed tomography
dc.subjectLung cancer
dc.subjectLung tumor
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectPathology
dc.subjectPhysician
dc.subjectPneumonia
dc.subjectPositron emission tomography-computed tomography
dc.subjectRadiation exposure
dc.subjectStereotactic body radiation therapy
dc.subjectThymoma type b2
dc.subjectTumor biopsy
dc.subjectUniversity hospital
dc.titleEfficacy of lung cancer screening at the American University of Beirut Medical Center
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-1037.pdf
Size:
348.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format