Gaussian process latent class choice models

dc.contributor.authorSfeir, Georges
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Filipe
dc.contributor.authorAbou-Zeid, Maya
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:28:20Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:28:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractWe present a Gaussian Process – Latent Class Choice Model (GP-LCCM) to integrate a non-parametric class of probabilistic machine learning within discrete choice models (DCMs). Gaussian Processes (GPs) are kernel-based algorithms that incorporate expert knowledge by assuming priors over latent functions rather than priors over parameters, which makes them more flexible in addressing nonlinear problems. By integrating a Gaussian Process within a LCCM structure, we aim at improving discrete representations of unobserved heterogeneity. The proposed model would assign individuals probabilistically to behaviorally homogeneous clusters (latent classes) using GPs and simultaneously estimate class-specific choice models by relying on random utility models. Furthermore, we derive and implement an Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to jointly estimate/infer the hyperparameters of the GP kernel function and the class-specific choice parameters by relying on a Laplace approximation and gradient-based numerical optimization methods, respectively. The model is tested on two different mode choice applications and compared against different LCCM benchmarks. Results show that GP-LCCM allows for a more complex and flexible representation of heterogeneity and improves both in-sample fit and out-of-sample predictive power. Moreover, behavioral and economic interpretability is maintained at the class-specific choice model level while local interpretation of the latent classes can still be achieved, although the non-parametric characteristic of GPs lessens the transparency of the model. © 2022 The Authors
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103552
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85122829515
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/27038
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDiscrete choice models
dc.subjectEm algorithm
dc.subjectGaussian process
dc.subjectLatent class choice models
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectApproximation algorithms
dc.subjectBenchmarking
dc.subjectGaussian distribution
dc.subjectGaussian noise (electronic)
dc.subjectMaximum principle
dc.subjectNumerical methods
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.subjectParameter estimation
dc.subjectChoice model
dc.subjectExpectations maximization algorithms
dc.subjectExpert knowledge
dc.subjectGaussian processes
dc.subjectLatent class
dc.subjectLatent class choice model
dc.subjectLatent function
dc.subjectNonparametrics
dc.subjectProbabilistics
dc.subjectAlgorithm
dc.subjectDiscrete choice analysis
dc.subjectEconomic analysis
dc.subjectGaussian method
dc.titleGaussian process latent class choice models
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-1979.pdf
Size:
1.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format