The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth

dc.contributor.authorKim, Joon-young
dc.contributor.authorMichaliszyn, Sara Fleet
dc.contributor.authorNasr, Alexis
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sojung
dc.contributor.authorTfayli, Hala M.
dc.contributor.authorHannon, Tamara S.
dc.contributor.authorHughan, Kara S.
dc.contributor.authorBacha, Fida
dc.contributor.authorArslanian, Silva A.
dc.contributor.departmentPediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:10:37Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:10:37Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), monophasic versus biphasic, identifies physiologically distinct groups of individuals with differences in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We aimed to verify the value of the OGTT-glucose response curve against more sensitive clampmeasured biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk, and to examine incretin/pancreatic hormones and free fatty acid associations in these curve phenotypes in obese adolescents without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 277 obese adolescents without diabetes completed a 2-h OGTT and were categorized to either a monophasic or a biphasic group. Body composition, abdominal adipose tissue, OGTT-based metabolic parameters, and incretin/pancreatic hormone levels were examined. A subset of 106 participants had both hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps to measure in vivo insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. RESULTS: Despite similar fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, the monophasic group had significantly higher glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acid OGTT areas under the curve compared with the biphasic group, with no differences in levels of glucagon, total glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and pancreatic polypeptide. Furthermore, the monophasic group had significantly lower in vivo hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, lack of compensatory first and second phase insulin secretion, and impaired β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In obese youth without diabetes, the risk imparted by the monophasic glucose curve compared with biphasic glucose curve, independent of fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, is reflected in lower insulin sensitivity and poorer β-cell function, which are two major pathophysiological biomarkers of type 2 diabetes in youth. © 2016 by the American Diabetes Association.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0352
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84980360412
dc.identifier.pmid27293201
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32364
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Diabetes Association Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetes Care
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdiposity
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectBiomarkers
dc.subjectBlood glucose
dc.subjectBody composition
dc.subjectBody mass index
dc.subjectC-peptide
dc.subjectCross-sectional studies
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus, type 2
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGastric inhibitory polypeptide
dc.subjectGlucagon
dc.subjectGlucagon-like peptide 1
dc.subjectGlucose tolerance test
dc.subjectHemoglobin a, glycosylated
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIncretins
dc.subjectInsulin
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPediatric obesity
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.subjectAdiponectin
dc.subjectC peptide
dc.subjectCholesterol
dc.subjectFatty acid
dc.subjectGlucagon like peptide 1
dc.subjectGlucose
dc.subjectHemoglobin a1c
dc.subjectHigh density lipoprotein
dc.subjectIncretin
dc.subjectLow density lipoprotein
dc.subjectPancreas hormone
dc.subjectPancreas polypeptide
dc.subjectTriacylglycerol
dc.subjectVery low density lipoprotein
dc.subjectBiological marker
dc.subjectGlucose blood level
dc.subjectGlycosylated hemoglobin
dc.subjectAbdominal fat
dc.subjectArea under the curve
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectB lymphocyte
dc.subjectBody fat
dc.subjectBody mass
dc.subjectCholesterol blood level
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectFatty acid blood level
dc.subjectGlucagon blood level
dc.subjectGlucose response curve
dc.subjectHemoglobin blood level
dc.subjectHormone blood level
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHyperglycemic clamp technique
dc.subjectHyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique
dc.subjectIn vivo study
dc.subjectInsulin blood level
dc.subjectInsulin release
dc.subjectInsulin sensitivity
dc.subjectLipoprotein blood level
dc.subjectLymphocyte function
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectNon insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
dc.subjectObesity
dc.subjectOral glucose tolerance test
dc.subjectPlots and curves
dc.subjectProtein blood level
dc.subjectTriacylglycerol blood level
dc.subjectBlood
dc.subjectChildhood obesity
dc.subjectCross-sectional study
dc.subjectMetabolism
dc.subjectRisk factor
dc.subjectSecretion (process)
dc.titleThe shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9430.pdf
Size:
917.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format