Multifocal electroretinography in amblyopia

dc.contributor.authorAl-Haddad, Christiane Elias
dc.contributor.authorBou Ghannam, Alaa S.
dc.contributor.authorEl Moussawi, Zeinab
dc.contributor.authorRachid, Elza
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Karine
dc.contributor.authorAtallah, Marwan
dc.contributor.authorSmeets, Larissa
dc.contributor.authorChahine, Hasan
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:08:42Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To identify whether there are functional abnormalities in the retina of amblyopic eyes using multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Methods: This is a prospective study of patients ≥ 7 years of age identified with unilateral amblyopia (strabismic or anisometropic). Multifocal ERG and flash ERG were performed to compare parameters between the amblyopic and non-amblyopic fellow eyes. A complete analysis of the five ring averages was done including the central ring. Results: Thirty-eight patients were included: mean age was 14.3 ± 7.3 years; 18 patients were strabismic and 20 were anisometropic. Amblyopic eye responses across the rings in multifocal ERG were diminished compared with fellow non-amblyopic eyes with significant differences detected in the central rings (p = 0.001). On the other hand, flash ERG did not show any consistently significant differences. When divided by severity, amplitudes of central rings were significantly lower in severely amblyopic eyes compared with non-amblyopic eyes (p = 0.001), while in mild amblyopia, no significant differences were observed. No significant difference was observed between anisometropic and strabismic amblyopic eyes. Conclusions: Using multifocal ERG, significantly decreased amplitudes were observed in amblyopic eyes compared with normal fellow eyes in the central ring. This correlated with the severity of amblyopia. No difference was observed when comparing the two groups of amblyopia (strabismic and anisometropic). Those findings may help clarify the pathophysiology of amblyopia better and open the door for new objective ways to monitor the response to amblyopia treatment but this needs to be further studied. © 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04558-x
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85077256357
dc.identifier.pmid31900648
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31890
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAmblyopia
dc.subjectElectroretinography
dc.subjectMultifocal electroretinography
dc.subjectVisual cortex
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectEvoked potentials, visual
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNerve fibers
dc.subjectProspective studies
dc.subjectRetina
dc.subjectTomography, optical coherence
dc.subjectVisual acuity
dc.subjectVisual fields
dc.subjectAnisometropia
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectClinical article
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDisease severity
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectProspective study
dc.subjectStrabismus
dc.subjectDiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectNerve fiber
dc.subjectOptical coherence tomography
dc.subjectPathology
dc.subjectPathophysiology
dc.subjectPhysiology
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectVisual evoked potential
dc.subjectVisual field
dc.titleMultifocal electroretinography in amblyopia
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6967.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections