Clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorMerashli, Mira
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Alves, Jose
dc.contributor.authorAmes, Paul R.J.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentRheumatology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:50:29Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:50:29Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective To evaluate the clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods A systematic search of EMBASE and PubMed databases from January 1983 to July 2016 was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines whereas Peto׳s odds ratio (OR) for rare events was used for the meta-analysis. Results The pooled prevalence of participants positive for IgG and IgM anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies was higher in SSc than controls (12.8% vs 1.6% and 7.8% vs 0.6%; p < 0.0001 for both) as was that of IgG and IgM anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I antibodies (aβ2GPI) (6.1% vs 0.58%, p < 0.0001; 3.5% vs 0.3%, p = 0.001). The pooled prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was more common in SSc positive than negative patients for aCL (IgG/IgM combined) (26.5% vs 10.9%, p < 0.0001) whereas the pooled prevalence of renal disease (RD) was more common in IgG aCL positive than negative patients (36.3% vs 10.9%, p = 0.02). The pooled prevalence of thrombosis was higher in IgG aCL, IgM aCL, and IgM aβ2GPI positive than negative SSc patients (12.6% vs 1.4%, p < 0.0001), (15.1% vs 2.7%, p = 0.002) and (15% vs 0.78%, p = 0.009), respectively. The pooled prevalence of digital infarction/ischemia (DI) was higher in IgG aCL and IgM positive than negative SSc (52.8% vs 39.8%, p = 0.002) and (68.1% vs 29%, p = 0.07). Conclusions A strong relationship exists between aCL and aβ2GPI of IgG/IgM isotype and SSc; patients positive for these antibodies are more likely to suffer from PAH, RD, thrombosis, and DI. However, data expressed as frequency of aPL positive patients rather than average antibody titers preclude further insight into the relevance of these assumptions. © 2017 Elsevier Inc.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.10.004
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85018555414
dc.identifier.pmid27838012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30950
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders
dc.relation.ispartofSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnti-beta2glycoprotein-i
dc.subjectAnticardiolipin
dc.subjectAntiphospholipid antibodies
dc.subjectLupus anticoagulant
dc.subjectSystemic sclerosis
dc.subjectAntibodies, antiphospholipid
dc.subjectAntiphospholipid syndrome
dc.subjectBiomarkers
dc.subjectCase-control studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHypertension, pulmonary
dc.subjectKidney diseases
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectScleroderma, systemic
dc.subjectThrombosis
dc.subjectBeta2 glycoprotein 1
dc.subjectCardiolipin antibody
dc.subjectImmunoglobulin g antibody
dc.subjectImmunoglobulin m antibody
dc.subjectPhospholipid antibody
dc.subjectBiological marker
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectInfarction
dc.subjectIschemia
dc.subjectKidney disease
dc.subjectMeta analysis
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectPulmonary hypertension
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectBlood
dc.subjectCase control study
dc.subjectComplication
dc.subjectPathophysiology
dc.titleClinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-8973.pdf
Size:
1.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format