MBRs for the treatment of high strength old landfill leachate :hollow fiber vs. flat sheet -

dc.contributor.authorHashisho, Jihan Mohamad
dc.contributor.departmentInterfaculty Graduate Environmental Sciences Program (Environmental Technology)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Architecture
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-03T10:23:42Z
dc.date.available2015-02-03T10:23:42Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.descriptionThesis. M.S.E.S. American University of Beirut. Interfaculty Graduate Environmental Sciences Program, (Environmental Technology), 2014. ET:6012
dc.descriptionAdvisor : Dr. Mutasem El-Fadel, Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering ; Committee members: Dr. Mahmoud Hindi, Assistant Professor, Chemical Engineering ; Dr. Darine Salam, Assistant Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.
dc.description.abstractThe generation of landfill leachate remains the main problem associated with municipal solid waste landfilling. In this study, membrane bioreactors (MBRs) were tested for leachate treatment through a combination of denitrification and aerobic processes to examine and compare the effectiveness of two membrane formats: hollow fiber and flat sheet. For this purpose, a laboratory scale MBR was constructed and operated to treat a leachate with COD (3,900-7,800 mg-L), BOD₅ (439.74-1536.67 mg-L), TP (10.5-59 mg-L), PO₄³⁻ (5-58), TN (1,500-5,200 mg-L), and NH₃ (1,770-4,410 mg-L). Both membranes, the flat sheet and hollow fiber, achieved comparable BOD (92.2 vs. 93.2percent) and TP (79.4 vs. 78.5percent) removals. However, while slightly higher COD and phosphate removal efficiencies were obtained with the Hollow Fiber membrane (71.4 vs. 68.5percent and 87.3 vs. 81.3percent, respectively), significantly higher TN and ammonia removal rates (61.2 vs. 49.4 and 63.4 vs. 47.8, respectively) were achieved by the Flat Sheet membrane. The experimental results contribute in filling a gap towards managing stabilized landfill leachate and providing guidelines for corresponding MBR applications
dc.format.extent1 online resource (xi, 72 leaves) : illustrations ; 30cm
dc.identifier.otherb18260196
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/10031
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofTheses, Dissertations, and Projects
dc.subject.classificationET:006012 AUBNO
dc.subject.lcshLeachate -- Environmental aspects -- Lebanon.
dc.subject.lcshSanitary landfills -- Lebanon -- Leaching.
dc.subject.lcshMembrane reactors.
dc.subject.lcshMembrane separation.
dc.subject.lcshMembranes (Technology)
dc.subject.lcshBioreactors.
dc.subject.lcshWaste disposal sites -- Environmental aspects -- Lebanon.
dc.subject.lcshSewage -- Purificat
dc.titleMBRs for the treatment of high strength old landfill leachate :hollow fiber vs. flat sheet -
dc.typeThesis

Files