Abstract:
Many scholars, foremost among them Mahmood Mamdani, have identified an emerging hegemonic western discourse: the Good Muslim (GM)- Bad Muslim (BM) distinction. By distinguishing between those Muslims who are liberal, secular, and peaceful and those who are violent, anti-modern, and fundamentalist, prominent politicians, pundits, and media elite have avoided the trappings of a bigoted essentialist discourse that views Islam as a monolithic civilization condemned to violence and backwardness. Is this the limit of mainstream progressive discourses on Islam? Because The Daily Show (TDS) is considered to represent the liberal-progressive position within mainstream American politics, it seems like a logical place to launch such an investigation. This project will conduct a discursive analysis of TDS’s coverage of Islam in an attempt to analyze the discursive terrain in which it participates. This analysis concludes that TDS, despite espousing a clearly non-interventionist foreign policy stance on the Muslim world, rearticulates many of the tropes and discourses that feed into the GM-BM distinction
Description:
Thesis. M.A. American University of Beirut. Department of Political Studies and Public Administration, 2015. T:6281
Advisor : Dr. Hatim El-Hibri, Assistant Professor, Media Studies ; Members of Committee : Dr. Samer Frangie, Assistant Professor, Political Studies ; Dr. Karim Makdisi, Associate Professor, Political Studies.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 88-94)