AUB ScholarWorks

Decision record 1007183 [2010] RRTA 930 : justice and history in a system of credibility -

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Davies, Jack William,
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-11T11:43:08Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-11T11:43:08Z
dc.date.copyright 2021-01
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.date.submitted 2018
dc.identifier.other b2104255x
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10938/21438
dc.description Thesis. M.A. American University of Beirut. Center for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies, 2018. T:6705$Advisor : Dr. Alexis Wick, Associate Professor, History and Archaeology ; Members of Committee : Dr. Nadya Sbaiti, Assistant Professor, Center for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies ; Dr. Walid Sadek, Chairperson, Fine Arts and Art History.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (leaves 108-111)
dc.description.abstract The following pages commit to a slow reading of a decision record from the Refugee Review Tribunal of Australia, which grants asylum to an elderly Iranian man for his anti-regime political opinion. The thesis seeks to read the record for how it codes this man’s past, and the past and future of his country, into a hegemonic formula of history and justice, to be made public under the code 1007183 [2010] RRTA 930 for its imagined, waiting spectators. Dividing its enquiry into two overlapping topics, the thesis first engages the record’s philosophy of history, studying the formal and temporal contours of its standard for evidence and reality, “credibility,” and the methods for establishing it. The second chapter takes up the content of the record’s legal and historical judgements, elaborating its conceptions of evil and justice to reveal a tautological process that posits secular legal code and legal reform as both the means and telos of legal and historical justice. The thesis concludes by combining these analyses while placing the record in its time, reading it as a document from 2010 determining the period 1979 to its present—a period marked by the end of existing socialism, the rise of modern political Islam, the reign of finance capital and neoliberal ideology, and the new salience of asylum processing as a site of political struggle. The thesis thus departs from a majority of scholarship on asylum processes, which typically targets certain procedural shortcomings and their impact on the asylum seeker’s fortunes, or attends to the subjectivities that crystallize out of the asylum encounter. Offering a novel analysis of asylum “credibility,” these pages ultimately focus on those putatively outside this encounter, its unwitting spectators, to suggest that prevailing academic and activist responses to present “refugee crises” risk recommitting to the post-Holocaust asylum system as they seek its reform. This system delivers history as a spectacle
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (ix, 111 leaves)
dc.language.iso eng
dc.subject.classification T:006705
dc.subject.lcsh Asylum, Right of -- Australia.$Iranians -- Australia.$Refugees -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Australia.$Knowledge, Theory of.$Law reform.$Political theology.
dc.title Decision record 1007183 [2010] RRTA 930 : justice and history in a system of credibility -
dc.title.alternative Justice and history in a system of credibility
dc.type Thesis
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Arts and Sciences.$Center for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies.
dc.contributor.institution American University of Beirut.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AUB ScholarWorks


Browse

My Account