Abstract:
After the discovery of an oil or gas field, an optimal field development plan must be
developed. Selecting the optimal plan leads not only to cost savings, but also to
maximized reservoir performance, and hence leads to a maximized projects’ net present
value. The development plan mainly consists of two crucial tasks that affect the
profitability of the project: well placement optimization and facility placement
optimization. Well placement optimization allows placing wells in zones containing
highest quantities of hydrocarbons initially in place. This requires the adoption of a
flexible algorithm that accounts for non-communicating flow units in the reservoir and
considers various well settings for each flow unit. Following well placement
optimization, optimizing facility placement and size is crucial to ensure optimal drilling,
production, gathering, and processing of hydrocarbons. This requires highly efficient and
flexible facility placement algorithms that account for topological complexities and
various constraints, leading to optimal hydrocarbon recovery while decreasing capital
cost.
In this work, well placement optimization is extended to multiple flow units reservoirs,
followed by well completion to selectively produce hydrocarbons from intended zones.
This allows for production from the entire reservoir while controlling fluid and sand
production. Black hole optimizer is employed to optimally placing wells of different types
(vertical/horizontal), spacing, and depths in multiple flow units. Open hole and
perforation completion types are adopted. Additionally, to optimally place facilities, this
work develops a clustering-based algorithm that optimizes facility placement layout in
oil and gas field development projects. The developed algorithm honors facility nodes’
capacities and considers realistic well trajectories and pipeline paths. Four clustering
approaches are implemented and compared: k-means, Hierarchical, Gaussian Mixture
Models, and DBSCAN. The clustering-based algorithm is compared with a non-gradient
algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, in terms of total facility cost and computational
requirements. The comparison is performed on different scenarios and different levels of
complexities that demonstrate the features of the developed algorithm. Results show that
the developed algorithm significantly outperforms PSO in terms of cost minimization but
presents higher computational load challenge.