JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Zaatari, Darine Mohamad Bassam |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-13T07:04:54Z |
| dc.date.available | 2012-06-13T07:04:54Z |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/6122 |
| dc.description | Thesis (M.A.)--American University of Beirut. Department of Philosophy, 2001;"Advisor: Dr. Muhammad ALi Khalildi, Assistant Professor, Philosophy--Member of Committee: Dr. Waddah N. Nasr, Associate Professor, Philosophy--Member of Committee: Dr. Bashshar |
| dc.description | Bibliography : leaves 77-80 |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this thesis is to critically examine some contemporary formulations of the empiricism-nativism debate.--In the introduction. I present an overview of the historical debate, and under the assumption that the evidence supporting nativism is stron |
| dc.format.extent | viii, 80 leaves |
| dc.language.iso | eng |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Theses, Dissertations, and Projects |
| dc.subject.classification | T:004154 AUBNO |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Carruthers, Peter, 1952-. Human knowledge and human nature;Cowie, Fiona, 1963-. What's within |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Empiricism -- History |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Innate ideas (Philosophy) |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Nativism (Psychology) |
| dc.title | What is left of the empiricism-nativism debate? - by Darine Mohamad Bassam Zaatari |
| dc.type | Thesis |
| dc.contributor.department | American University of Beirut. Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Department of Philosophy |
