AUB ScholarWorks

Opening the black box :knowledge production of United States covert and clandestine operations under the Obama administration -

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Flahive, Robert Andrew.
dc.date 2013
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-03T10:46:25Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-03T10:46:25Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.date.submitted 2013
dc.identifier.other b17902563
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10938/9882
dc.description Thesis (M.A.)--American University of Beirut, Department of Political Studies and Public Administration, 2013.
dc.description Advisor : Dr. Waleed Hazbun, Associate Professor, Political Studies and Public Administration--Committee Members : Dr. Alexander Barder, Assistant Professor, Political Studies and Public Administration ; Dr. Coralie Pison-Hindawi, Assistant Professor, Political Studies and Public Administration ; Dr. Lisa Hajjar, Visiting Professor, CASAR.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (leaves 98-104)
dc.description.abstract This thesis argues the Obama Administration relies upon covert and clandestine operations to aggregate operational, bureaucratic, legal, and discursive authority. I demonstrate the ways in which information is mediated through two sites – the operational site and the sites of mediation in covert and clandestine operations. I argue the two are deeply complementary, and essential to such operations. This examination of the two sites of information mediation in covert and clandestine operations illustrates the extent to which the Obama Administration not only embraced the operational and information mediation logic of the “War on Terror”, but more crucially, the extent to which such logic was institutionalized under this Administration. I conceptualize covert and clandestine operations as Bruno Latour’s black box to show the ways information in these operations is mediated. I first narrow the focus to what I term the “technical content”, the operational site of the Horn of Africa to illustrate the extent of regional engagement required to conduct covert and clandestine operations, as well as the ways in which the operational infrastructure disappears from public view. The latter point is crucial, given it enables the oft-cited rationale, namely “light footprint” to suggest US military disengagement. On the other hand, the mediation of information flows through institutions and instruments for covert and clandestine operations illustrate the extent to which such operations aggregate bureaucratic, legal, and discursive authority in the hands in the executive. I label such institutions and instruments as the “institutional context”, and focus attention on these mechanics in the third chapter. I survey the primary institutional instruments available to the executive branch to illustrate how the Obama Administration obstructs information, employs legal inscriptions to legitimate actions, and attempts to close black boxes through discursive tactics at the site
dc.format.extent xi 104 leaves ; 30 cm.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Theses, Dissertations, and Projects
dc.subject.classification T:005885 AUBNO
dc.subject.lcsh United States. Central Intelligence Agency.
dc.subject.lcsh Military intelligence -- United States.
dc.subject.lcsh Knowledge management -- United States.
dc.subject.lcsh Secret service -- United States.
dc.subject.lcsh Intelligence service -- United States.
dc.subject.lcsh Mass media and war -- United States.
dc.subject.lcsh United States -- Military policy.
dc.subject.lcsh United States -- Foreign relations.
dc.title Opening the black box :knowledge production of United States covert and clandestine operations under the Obama administration -
dc.type Thesis
dc.contributor.department American University of Beirut. Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Department of Political Studies and Public Administration.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AUB ScholarWorks


Browse

My Account