AUB ScholarWorks

Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention (AAC) on Students with Disabilities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor El-Hassan, Karma
dc.contributor.author Abou Housse, Amineh
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-01T06:14:28Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-01T06:14:28Z
dc.date.issued 2/1/2023
dc.date.submitted 1/31/2023
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10938/23885
dc.description.abstract Children with disabilities (e.g., Down Syndrome, Autism, Intellectual Disability, Apraxia of Speech, Cerebral Palsy, etc…) are at increased risk of various deficits, including speech and language development. Thus, they face challenges with their social communication and interactions, behaviors, academic achievement, and most importantly being independent. Currently, there is a rapid growing body of evidence and research-based studies on “Augmentative and Alternative Communication” intervention approach on non-verbal children with disabilities to facilitate their functional communication skills using manual signs, communication boards with symbols, and computerized devices (ranging from low-tech to high-tech). The use of this intervention has become an essential part of speech production for children with disabilities to experience the power of communication, express their needs, wants, feelings and emotions, and socialize by developing the foundation for literacy skills and later language. A systematic review of literature was conducted, using different keywords and electronic searches, to explore the efficacy of AAC intervention on their social communication skills, academic literacy skills, psychological and behavioral outcomes. In addition, the study aimed at assessing the differential impact of this intervention on domain-specific outcomes (social, behavioral, academic, psychological) as it may be more effective in one domain than in another and identifying gaps in existing literature to stimulate future research efforts aimed at developing new and more effective communication intervention strategies. Initially, a total of 762 studies were identified for screening through systematic searches of databases and then 13 studies were evaluated after setting inclusion and exclusion criteria. Findings indicated that there was evidence that augmentative and alternative communication intervention (AAC) enhanced functional communication interaction, improved literacy skills, reduced challenging behaviors, and boosted the children’s motivation, confidence, self-esteem and independent life-skills.
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC); Communication Disorder, Speech-Generated Devices, Complex Communication Needs, Children with Communication Disorders, Communication Intervention; Aided Speech Interventions, Communication Impairment; Social Interaction Skills; Behavioral Outcomes; Psychological Outcomes; Academic Literacy Skills.
dc.title Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention (AAC) on Students with Disabilities
dc.type Thesis
dc.contributor.department Department of Education
dc.contributor.faculty Faculty of Arts and Sciences
dc.contributor.institution American University of Beirut
dc.contributor.commembers Khamis, Vivian
dc.contributor.degree MA
dc.contributor.AUBidnumber 201700321


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AUB ScholarWorks


Browse

My Account